Monday 28 January 2013

Studio lighting course - flash lighting

For the second part of my studio lighting course, we focused on flash lighting.  I thought this would be a lot more difficult given my past experiences of working with my speedlite but it was not as difficult to get my head around after all.  I think that a lot of what I had learnt in relation to my speedlite came in very useful for this part of the course.

Flash lighting was a breath of fresh air compared to the tungsten lighting.  I found it much easier to use than a speedlite and I feel that part of this was down to the modelling light.  This small light gives you an idea of where the light will fall which is very useful especially when applying light shapers to your shot.  

Where flash lighting differs is you need to use a light meter to get the correct exposure for your image as you can't rely on your camera's meter.  This is because your camera can't give you accurate results for the flash of light.  

There are two ways in which you can use the meter to read the light.  You can measure the light reflected off your subject or you can measure the light source the subject is exposed to.  I found the latter to be the easiest and most reliable to work with.  If you are measuring the light reflecting off your subject you can get varying results depending on the colour of their skin or the clothes they may be wearing.  

For studio flash you have to shoot with your camera on manual.  I am glad all my hard work getting to know how to use my camera manually came in useful!  The standard shutter speed used for studio flash is 1/125s as this gives the curtain enough time to stay open for the flash of light.  Any faster and you run the risk of having one half of your image in darkness and the other half lit.  When you use the light meter you input the shutter speed and ISO you are using and then take a test shot to get the flash to fire. This you do while holding down the reader button the meter.  The meter will then give you the aperture you should use to get a correct average exposure.  You may of course wish to vary this if you want to make your image lighter or darker.  

Here are some of the images I tool using studio flash.  





I think the light in these images is better than using tungsten.  I found it easier to remove the harsh shadows using the reflectors. 

Studio lighting course - tungsten lighting

Well I have attended the first session of my course and the focus was on tungsten lighting.  I have a little knowledge of using continuous lighting from The Art of Photography course where I experimented using a builders light.  However, what I really wanted was a play around with the real McCoy.

Tungsten lighting or continuous lighting and is constant and extremely bright.  The tungsten bulbs we used were 500watts which may not seem to much (especially when trying to get a good shutter speed) by they are very bright for the model.

For the practical session we worked in groups of three and I was first to act as model.  We used a red head with an 850 watt buld which was very bright in my eyes.  It was almost blinding and pretty uncomfortable too.  You started to feel quite hot very quickly under the light.

I found that shooting in this light was easy in relation to seeing where shadows were falling.  You could use your camera's own meter to get the exposure right.  However, I did find that the light was pretty harsh and introduced some strong shadows in my subject's face.  This might work well for a certain look you may be trying to achieve or for shooting men.  For women the general rule is that the light and shadows should be softer.

To soften the light we have to make it bigger and to do this we used a diffuser.  This made the light softer and the images less contrasty.  The joy of working with continuous lighting is you can see the changes in front of your eyes whereas with flash you can't.

To manipulate the light and direct light to open or reduce shadow areas you can use reflectors.  I am familiar with using these as I already to this for shooting in natural light.  This improves the results but I still couldn't help feeling that the light was still very harsh overall.

Generally tungsten lighting is not used for portraits as it is not the most comfortable for clients/models to sit under this light.  It tends work better for still life images where your subjects don't have eyes!

This session gave me some hands on experience of using tungsten lighting and I learnt the most suitable conditions for using this light. I have read about making the light source bigger but I have now experienced this first hand.  I do have a speedlite of my own but this is not an ideal tool for learning the basics of lighting.

I learnt that studio lights get extremely hot and that bulbs don't tend to last very long.

Here are some of my images.

In this image we can see the strong shadows on the subjects nose.  I find this distracting as the shadow is very close to the eye too. 

In this image the shadow is strong but it is less distracting.  

In this image the shadow is less harsh and the lighting is more evenly distributed across the model's face. 



Studio Lighting course

A couple of weeks ago I started a short studio lighting course at City Lit in London.  I wanted to explore the ways in which photographic lighting can used in portraiture and get some hands on experience of using the various lights.  

The course will cover: 
- Advantages and disadvantages of lighting
- Exposure
- Backgrounds
- Tungsten lighting
- Flash lighting
- Light shapers, contrast control and reflectors
- Portraits
- Still life objects

By the end of the course I should be able to:

- Use a hand held light meter
- Create a portrait lit by tungsten and flash lighting
- Photograph a still life object lit by tungsten and flash lighting
- Control the level of contrast desired by the use of reflectors and light shapers
- Begin to use some of the creative possibilities that control of light allows

I will post my learning outcomes on my blog and hopefully some good portraits. 


Cartier-Bresson at Somerset House

On Friday I eventually got round to going to Cartier-Bresson: A Question of Colour at Somerset House.  The exhibition opened in November and I managed to catch it before it closed on 27 January.

Cartier-Bresson's work was primarily in black and white which allowed him to photograph in a more artistic way.  Colour it was believed was restricted for business.  Improvements in colour reproduction however led to an increased in demand for colour photography in the post-war period.

Cartier-Bresson was sceptical about the artistic potential for colour photography and he had misgivings about colour as an expressive form.  Despite this he acquiesced that colour was in its infancy and had room to grow and become something perhaps greater.

This exhibition looks at a number of photographers whose devotion to expression in colour measures up to Cartier-Bresson's requirement that content and form are in perfect balance.  These include his contemporaries like Ernt Haas and Fred Herzog.  Few however could live up to his demands to for 'the simultaneous recognition, in a fraction of a second, of the significance of an event as well as of a precise organisation of forms which give that event its proper expression'.

I thought this exhibition would give me some more insight into the use of colour over black and white photography as this is something that I struggle with at times.  It did but I felt that it fell short somehow perhaps because of the number of photographers included in the exhibition.  I think the layout of the exhibition was a little busy and as some images were displayed in corridors.  The rooms were small and pokey and with more than a handful of people present it became difficult to move around.

I choose not to work exclusively in one medium of the other but admit that I may have had a leaning towards black and white when I first started out.  However after learning more about colour and its effects on an image I feel that I might be leaning more towards it as a preferred option.  I feel that colour can give a different kind of emotion to a picture.  We can be overwhelmed before even looking too deeply at an image solely by the photographer's use of colour.

When I shoot I tend to shoot with colour in mind.  This is probably as a result of shooting digitally.  However, I occasionally set out to shoot in black and white and makes me view my subject differently.  I think having always worked in colour opting to convert to black and white places modern photographers at a disadvantage when it comes to black and white images.  We don't tend to instinctively know the graphical elements that make a good subject for a black and white rendering.

The exhibition included some of the usual suspects like Joel Meyerowitz and Trent Parke.  Some of the photographers that particularly appealed to me in this exhibition whose work I hadn't see before was Andy Freeberg, Karl Baden and Boris Savelev.  I will write about them separately on my blog.

Overall the exhibition provided a link for me with Cartier-Bresson and colour which is something I didn't have before.  It has given me some food for thought about the uses of colour over black and white and it has introduced me to some interesting photographers who have worked in unusual projects.

Thursday 24 January 2013

Thomas Struth - Museum photographs

As part of my research for assignment 3 where the focus was shooting indoor public spaces in London I set about looking for photographers that have worked have carried out extensive work on indoor spaces.

When I started to think about photographing indoors and public spaces, I recalled a visit I made to the Whitechapel Gallery last year to see the work of German photographer Thomas Struth.

Struth has worked in various interiors from museums to places of worship, space stations to industrial factories.  An image of the Pantheon in Rome sticks out in my mind where he plays with the sheer size of the building and the people standing to admire it.  I find the rich colours in this image very appealing and the first thing that grabbed my attention.

Although his work involved a level of interaction between the people in his shot and the place they occupy I feel that some of his work is relevant to my assignment on building spaces.

After encountering several unsuccessful attempts to produce photographs with visitors in the Pergamon Museum in the 1990s, he decided to stage the event and in turn a series of photographs in various museum spaces.  These include the Pantheon series and are among the very few museum photographs where the position of the people has been completely orchestrated by the photographer.

I'm not sure how I feel about this.  When I first saw the image of the Pantheon I found it interesting to look at the people to see what they are doing or looking at.  You feel cheated in a way to discover that this is not a natural occurring event by one manipulated my the photographer.

His work extends from this into the world of industrialisation and technology where we see the inside of the Kennedy Space Centre in Cape Caneveral.  I think his images of factory interiors are amazing and lead us to contemplate the complexity of every day products we may take for granted and the complexity involved in producing them.  It also works as a milestone to see how we have evolved.

I have planned to shoot some museums for my assignment and unlike Struth I will not be orchestrating any of them.  If given the opportunity of doing so I'm not sure how I would feel about it.  However, what I will take from his work is the way in which he illustrate space and its uses.

Thomas Struth

Photographs 1978 - 2010

Whitechapel Gallery exhibition information

Monday 21 January 2013

An interesting project - Niall McDiarmid

Niall McDiarmid is a commericial photographer based in London who has worked for various magazines and publishers in the UK and America.  About 18 months ago he embarked on a personal long term project which he has called 'Crossing Paths' where he photographs the interesting people he meets as he travels around the UK.  

I have read about portrait challenges that photographers have done like 100 portraits in 100 days but they have never really appealed to me.  Art is something that cannot be forced in my opinion and quality is far more important than quantity.  If I were to undertake a challenge of this sort I feel a high percentage of the portraits would not be very interesting and shot just for shootings sake.  However, the sort of project McDiarmid is working on is far more interesting as it focuses on the interesting people he meets rather than shooting everyone he meets.

He has set up a dedicated website for his project and I like the variety in the work that is on display.  His has a strong use of colour and at times I find this almost daring as he is not afraid to shoot people with brightly coloured backgrounds as in Chapel Street, Woking where he placed his subject - a vicar - in front of a very bright blue wall.  Looking at how I tend to set up my portrait shots this is something I would try to avoid.  I suppose I am not very confident in working with such strong colours but I can now see how effective they can be.  

His use of bright colours adds a welcoming and almost friendly vibe which makes for candid shots.  The subjects display varying degrees of interaction with the photographer and they all look happy being photographed which in turn leads to a more genuine portrait where their personality shines through.  

In addition, McDiarmid makes great use of the graphical element available to him like lines, shapes and textures as in the image Marine Road East, Morecambe.  

I think what I would like to experiment with after looking at McDiarmuid's work is colour in my portraits whilst also paying attention to the backgrounds more.  


Monday 14 January 2013

Klein/Moriyama study visit


On 12 January I attended the OCA study visit to the Klein/Moriyama exhibition at the Tate. 
In preparation for the visit I watched the BBC’s Imagine programme – The Many of Lives of William Klein which I recorded before Christmas.  I also watched the Tate video on Daido Moriyama.  I relied on the internet for further research and viewing of images.

From my first impressions of their work I feel I had a tendency towards Klein finding his work personally more interesting and possibly familiar.  Moriyama’s work seemed to present some kind of barrier or distance and I found it hard to digest his images finding them dark and often impenetrable. One of the first questions I asked myself was why a joint exhibition? 

Moriyama was influenced by the work of Klein would be the most obvious answer to that question but was that it?  Their work on first glance may seem similar – black and white images of life on city streets – but on closer inspection they are very different. 
The fact that both worked in each others’ cities would perhaps be a stronger parallel. Although Moriyama’s New York is a very different city to the one we see in Life is good and good for you in New York.  Likewise can be said for Klein’s Tokyo. 

The exhibition begins with Klein’s work, more specifically his film Broadway by Light, where we are introduced to the city’s gaudy neon signs – a forerunner of pop art.  We see Klein the artist as he was more than simply one of the greatest photographers to come out of the US as this exhibition shows us. 

Rooms 2 and 3 display the images that were to make up Klein’s first book – a photo diary of New York – an idea which would lead to further diaries of Rome, Tokyo and Moscow.  After living in Paris he returned to New York to work as a fashion photographer.  During this time he began work on his photo diary where he saw the city – his home town – from the eyes of an outsider.  The result is a collection of candid shots of life in New York in the 50s. 

I found Klein’s use of a wide angle lens very interesting.  In all his images the viewer feels part of what is happening as the photographer is part of the action.  It is very different from Henri Cartier-Bresson the man who inspired Klein.  My own personal experiments with street photography have usually involved the use of a medium to telephoto lens which introduces a distance in the image.  I feel that moving forward I would like to experiment more with a wide angle lens in the hope of injecting some energy into my street work. 

I also find the interaction with the subjects in his images.  It is clear that he is not being conspicuous.  They are very much aware of his presence.  However, true street photographers would argue that the essence of this genre is to capture life on the street without interacting with the subjects.  This interaction can lead to a more posed shot and a subject who is aware of the camera behaving differently.  However, I feel the interaction and awareness of the photographer in Klein’s work displays an intimate moment that might have been lost otherwise. 

Rooms 4 and 5 look at Klein’s earlier work as an abstract painter and provide a necessary background if you are attempting to discover where he is coming from.  I feel that this background as a painter and an abstract painter led to Klein’s experiments with his images in Contacts. In this series he experimented with blowing up his contact sheets and using a red pencil/enamel paint he shows the chosen image.  Again we see his work moving into the pop art world. 

If Klein’s exhibition is wide and varied in size and subject matter with large prints and film, Moriyama’s introduction is almost understated.  I feel that is it a disservice to the artist that his work is presented after Klein’s in the exhibition.  Klein’s work has stimulated all the senses and finishes with the bright colourful Contact images.  When entering Moriyama’s exhibition the images are small and black and white and I couldn’t help feel it was a bit of an anti-climax. 

I feel that also due to the sheer volume of work displayed in Klein’s rooms the exhibition goer is probably suffering from fatigue and information overload by the time they come to view Moriyama’s work.  I know I was and from talking to other people on the study visit many of them had already been before or were planning to go again. 

As Moriyama works with the intentions of publishing his images in books I feel that this has an impact on the images exhibited.  They are small (possibly to replicate the experience of viewing a book) and difficult to adapt to after Klein’s work.

Moriyama’s work in contrast to Klein’s is very dark and sinister.  The high contrast black and white and graininess of his images makes for hard viewing and demands a lot of the viewer.  They are not pretty but then they don’t have to be, but they do portray Tokyo as a very dark, unwelcoming place. 

Where Klein’s New York is vibrant and full of energy Moriyama’s New York is seen from the view of a cultural outsider.  His streets are bare and his people do not have the energy and intimacy we see in Klein’s work.  I feel that they are images resulting from an outsider looking in who has not connected with his subjects or the place.  There is a sense of loneliness and not belonging.  This sense of loneliness and not belonging is how I feel about Moriyama’s work myself.  It is a world that is culturally very different to ours.  It is unfamiliar.  It makes me feel uneasy.   

I feel the reasons why I prefer the work of Klein can be summarised as follows:
  • The order in which they are presented tends to favour Klein as does the variety of work presented.
  • The cultural language of Moriyama’s work is a challenge.  It is unfamiliar territory.  It presents a barrier that I found hard to get over.
  • There is humour in Klein’s work that I don’t feel there is in Moriyama’s
  • In the film on Klein you can associate more with him
  • More subjects in Klein’s work – a more diverse range.

Some of the parallels in their work
  • Both worked in the city, but the city meant different things to them.  Moriyama in his film says that he can’t make photographs without a city.
  •   Post production work and the re-working of old images can be seen in Moriyama’s dog image and Klein’s Contacts
  • Both willing to push the limits of photography and introduce other ways of making the final image.
For me, Klein will have more of an impact on my work.  I will as I have mentioned earlier experiment with a wide angle lens.  However, I will also look at shooting on the streets with a compact camera as Moriyama does.
The exhibition has given me plenty of food for thought in relation to black and white versus colour, post production, street photography versus posed shots and presenting your work at an exhibition. 

Sunday 13 January 2013

Exercise 18: How space changes with light

If you re-visit a place at different times of the day or even in different weather the light is different and can alter the scene.

Taking one or two locations, I had to photograph them in different lighting situations.

The images are of a hotel room.

Taken at night in artificial lighting

Taken the next morning with the light from the window only

For a different viewpoint I decided to shoot away from the bright lights at night and chose a different composition of the bed. The lighting effect is softer but I am not so sure about the angle of the bed. 



I also chose to focus on the desk.  

  

Exercise 17: The user's viewpoint

For this exercise I had to chose 2-5 buildings or spaces designed for a particular activity that is taken from a specific, distinctive position.

For each of these places I had to take photographs that attempt to capture the user's point of view, whilst considering height, orientation and lens focal length.

So, for example, if a room or space is to be used from a sitting position I should shoot from a sitting position.

The first building I looked at was Waltham Abbey in Essex.  I wanted to capture the building from the user's viewpoint which I believe was mainly from a sitting position. I have included images from a standing and kneeling position too.

Taken with a wide angle lens kneeling down.  

Standing position looking down the aisle.  This viewpoint is a little less intimate for the viewer - there is a slight distance. 

Taken from a sitting position looking down the aisle.  

I think of the three images there one from a standing position is the less effective.  




The next building/space I looked at was in the inside of a train.  This is taken from a seated position.  I feel that this gives the viewer a better sense of presence in the scene.